There are a few reasons why portrait orientation is often preferred. A portrait typically features a person or object looking toward the camera. The portrait is concerned with conveying a person's soul, individuality, character, and expression through the use of backgrounds, lighting, and posture. But what are the main differences? What is Portrait orientation? In orientation, portrait orientation typically features people or objects looking toward the camera, while landscape orientation typically features the camera looking out from a scene. But have you considered the orientation of your shots? This article will explore the differences between portrait mode vs landscape to help you decide which is best for your photography. As a photographer, you've probably taken the time to think about what composition works best for each photo.
PORTRAIT VS LANDSCAPE PREFERENCE HOW TO
But the hardware needs to feel equally comfortable in any case.Undoubtedly, the more you study, the better you will become, but if you keep asking how to get started without doing anything, you may not go very far in capturing images.
PORTRAIT VS LANDSCAPE PREFERENCE SOFTWARE
It's fine to design software that prefers one orientation over another: such choices often result in intelligent use of the canvas and standout features and capabilities.
It's not enough that the OS supports multiple orientations the hardware needs to be usable in those different orientations. Ultimately, what we need from tomorrow's tablet devices is versatility. Granted, that's true for most tablets, but a selling point of 7' devices is easier one-handed operation something that evaporates when the OS demands you stay locked in to landscape. That awkward feeling isn't confined to the portrait mode, either landscape-optimized devices like the Playbook aren't exactly a joy to use one-handed. It feels a little like holding a diving board in your hands. Devices in the 7' range suffer a less from the awkwardness, but using a full-sized Xoom or that huge ham-beast, the Toshiba Excite 13.3, in portrait mode is an exercise in hilarity. This is excellent for watching movies, but not as ideal for activities like document editing (unless you're making use of an app that employs many columns).Īnd just try using one of those "widescreen" tablets in portrait configuration. Where the iPad uses a 4:3 ratio, many other tablets, such as the ASUS Transformer line and the aforementioned Xoom devices, employ a much more "theatrical" 16:9 or 16:10. That brings to light another important point: aspect ratio. Movies, for example, are best watched in landscape mode to take advantage of the wider display area. Which one is "better" overall will always be a matter of the user's taste, but broadly speaking, some orientations work better for some tasks. The nice thing about these divergent approaches is choice: even though consumers can choose between only two dominant OSes when tablet shopping, they have a multitude of form factors if they opt for Google's flavor. Unless you're talking about the 8.9-inch Xyboard:Īnd landscape-centric design isn't just confined to the larger tablets, as the Blackberry Playbook and aborted HP TouchPad Go demonstrate. Aside from telling us who's provided the device, these unsubtle decals let us know that these are landscape-centric devices
Since then, we've seen the Motorola Xoom and Xyboard devices launch in many flavors, sporting both manufacturer logos and garish carrier branding as well. In the case of this device, the visual cues in favor of verticality were even more pronounced because, as a pre-Honeycomb device, hardware buttons still ran across the bezel below the screen. The original Galaxy Tab was the first mainstream iPad competitor to gain any real traction, and it favored portrait usage. Buttons, casings, and -worst of all- logos dictate how we should hold the non-Apple tablets of today. Sure, most of them still provide the ability to transition between portrait and landscape modes just by turning the device, but the cues their designs provide are much less flexible in their "suggested" means of holding them. Since the iPad, we've seen a slew of tablets launch from all manner of competing companies, not all of whom have been so open to the idea of multiple orientations. In this manner, the experience stayed versatile, and the iPad felt equally "correct" in either orientation. The only break in the featureless front panel was the home button, which provided a slight visual anchor to portrait orientation, but which didn't look all that out of place when the device was rotated to landscape. The finishing touch, though, was in the iPad's minimalist design.
0 kommentar(er)
